Teesta Seetalwad, who had been earlier hailed as a ‘Crusader for justice’ by a section of media, before she go..
Oct 19 2011 | Supreme Court has heavily criticised the Haj policy of Central government specifically the practice of sending VIPs on Haj from public money, calling it ‘bad religious practice’.
The bench of Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Ranjana Prakash made this remark in relation with the discretionary quota of Government that allows them to nominate 11000 pilgrims, which are distributed across politically sensitive states. The court minced no words in saying that it might have political use but it’s not Haj.
It however, continued the stay on the Bombay High Court order which instructed the government to allot 800 seats out of its 11000 quota, to private operators
Share Your View via Facebook
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's recent reply to a question perhaps directly addresses the core mindset of the ISIS:
Lauding the services of police force Modi said the credit for the atmosphere of peace and law and order during last deca..
The nation is currently agitated over the inability of the UPA Government to force the Chinese Army to retreat from Daul..
"The voters rejected the Congress in UP,” said a Congress leader a day after the party got a pounding in the ..